Journal of Loss and Trauma

954 papers and 14.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 954 papers published in Journal of Loss and Trauma in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Loss and Trauma usually cover Clinical Psychology (779 papers), Sociology and Political Science (177 papers) and Social Psychology (174 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Health and Trauma (348 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (327 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (276 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Loss and Trauma are Luca Pietrantoni, Gabriele Prati, Bruce D. Perry, Erick T. Baloran, Stephen Joseph, Astier M. Almedom, P. Alex Linley, Jane Shakespeare‐Finch, Ramona Alaggia and Güler Boyraz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Loss and Trauma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Loss and Trauma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Loss and Trauma.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Loss and Trauma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Loss and Trauma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Loss and Trauma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Loss and Trauma more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025