Insect Conservation and Diversity

930 papers and 16.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 930 papers published in Insect Conservation and Diversity in the last decades have received a total of 16.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Insect Conservation and Diversity usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (588 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (462 papers) and Insect Science (336 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (504 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (433 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (302 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Insect Conservation and Diversity are John M. Pleasants, Richard Fox, Karen S. Oberhauser, Manu E. Saunders, Pedro Cardoso, Simon R. Leather, Christine Haaland, Russell E. Naisbit, Louis‐Félix Bersier and Paulo de Marco Júnior.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Insect Conservation and Diversity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Insect Conservation and Diversity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Insect Conservation and Diversity.

Countries where authors publish in Insect Conservation and Diversity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Insect Conservation and Diversity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Insect Conservation and Diversity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insect Conservation and Diversity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025