Cardiovascular Toxicology

1.1k papers and 21.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Cardiovascular Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 21.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiovascular Toxicology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (438 papers), Molecular Biology (365 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (154 papers) specifically the topics of Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (141 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (119 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiovascular Toxicology are Allan R. Brasier, Y. James Kang, Kendall B. Wallace, Lu Cai, Brian B. Hasinoff, H. Cortés-Funes, Nikki Gillum Posnack, Daywin Patel, Elahe Khodadi and Pitchai Balakumar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiovascular Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiovascular Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiovascular Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiovascular Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiovascular Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiovascular Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiovascular Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025