Current Alzheimer Research

1.9k papers and 57.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Current Alzheimer Research in the last decades have received a total of 57.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Alzheimer Research usually cover Physiology (849 papers), Molecular Biology (452 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (366 papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (771 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (330 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (292 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Alzheimer Research are Suzanne Craft, Nigel H. Greig, Suzanne M. de la Monte, Julie A. Schneider, David A. Bennett, Debomoy K. Lahiri, Sultan Darvesh, Inge Grundke‐Iqbal, Yaakov Stern and John Hardy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Alzheimer Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Alzheimer Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Alzheimer Research.

Countries where authors publish in Current Alzheimer Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Alzheimer Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Alzheimer Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Alzheimer Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025