Critical Reviews in Immunology

751 papers and 29.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 751 papers published in Critical Reviews in Immunology in the last decades have received a total of 29.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Reviews in Immunology usually cover Immunology (494 papers), Molecular Biology (170 papers) and Oncology (156 papers) specifically the topics of Immune Cell Function and Interaction (234 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (217 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (168 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Immunology are Charles D. Mills, Shankar S. Iyer, Alexander L. Weis, Solomon P. Wasser, John Hural, Philippe Le Bouteiller, Thomas D. Gootz, Gordon D. Ross, B. Paul Morgan and Denis P. Snider.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Immunology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Immunology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Immunology.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Immunology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Immunology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Immunology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Immunology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025