Comptes Rendus Physique

1.7k papers and 31.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Comptes Rendus Physique in the last decades have received a total of 31.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Comptes Rendus Physique usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (504 papers), Materials Chemistry (315 papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (283 papers) specifically the topics of Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (83 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (76 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comptes Rendus Physique are Jérôme Martin, Antoine Godard, Pavan Hosur, Xiao-Liang Qi, Jean‐Michel Nunzi, Nicolas Laflorencie, Fabien Alet, D. Beysens, Frédéric Caupin and Éric Herbert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Comptes Rendus Physique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comptes Rendus Physique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comptes Rendus Physique.

Countries where authors publish in Comptes Rendus Physique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comptes Rendus Physique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comptes Rendus Physique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comptes Rendus Physique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025