Countries where authors publish in Xenotransplantation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Xenotransplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Xenotransplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xenotransplantation more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Xenotransplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Xenotransplantation.
About Xenotransplantation
The 1.6k papers published in Xenotransplantation in the last decades have received a total of 29.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Xenotransplantation usually cover Surgery (1.5k papers), Transplantation (74 papers) and Genetics (643 papers) specifically the topics of Xenotransplantation and immune response (1.3k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (399 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (342 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (334 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (296 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (279 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (129 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Xenotransplantation are David K. C. Cooper, Joachim Denner, Hidetaka Hara, Henk‐Jan Schuurman, Mohamed Ezzelarab, David Ayares, Jay A. Fishman, David H. Sachs, Anthony J.F. d’Apice and Megan Sykes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.