Xenotransplantation

1.6k papers and 28.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Xenotransplantation in the last decades have received a total of 28.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Xenotransplantation usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Genetics (638 papers) and Molecular Biology (244 papers) specifically the topics of Xenotransplantation and immune response (1.3k papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (393 papers) and Pancreatic Islet Dysfunction and Regeneration (342 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Xenotransplantation are David K. C. Cooper, Joachim Denner, Hidetaka Hara, Henk‐Jan Schuurman, Mohamed Ezzelarab, David Ayares, Jay A. Fishman, David H. Sachs, Anthony J.F. d’Apice and Jörg D. Seebach.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Xenotransplantation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Xenotransplantation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Xenotransplantation.

Countries where authors publish in Xenotransplantation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Xenotransplantation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Xenotransplantation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xenotransplantation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025