Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Inducing a Magnetic Monopole with Topological Surface States
2009735 citationsXiao-Liang Qi, Rundong Li et al.profile →
Nonlocal Transport in the Quantum Spin Hall State
2009688 citationsJoseph Maciejko, Xiao-Liang Qi et al.profile →
Topological quantization of the spin Hall effect in two-dimensional paramagnetic semiconductors
2006583 citationsXiao-Liang Qi, Yong-Shi Wu et al.Physical Review Bprofile →
Recent developments in transport phenomena in Weyl semimetals
This map shows the geographic impact of Xiao-Liang Qi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xiao-Liang Qi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xiao-Liang Qi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Xiao-Liang Qi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Xiao-Liang Qi. The network helps show where Xiao-Liang Qi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Xiao-Liang Qi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Xiao-Liang Qi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Xiao-Liang Qi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Xiao-Liang Qi. Xiao-Liang Qi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hosur, Pavan & Xiao-Liang Qi. (2014). Tunable optical activity due to the chiral anomaly in Weyl semimetals. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
7.
Hosur, Pavan & Xiao-Liang Qi. (2014). Tunable optical activity as a probe of the chiral anomaly in Weyl semimetals. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014.1 indexed citations
8.
Bulmash, Daniel, Chao‐Xing Liu, & Xiao-Liang Qi. (2013). Weyl Semimetal in Hg 1 - x - y Cd x Mn y Te. arXiv (Cornell University). 2014.2 indexed citations
9.
Hosur, Pavan & Xiao-Liang Qi. (2013). Recent developments in transport phenomena in Weyl semimetals. Comptes Rendus Physique. 14(9-10). 857–870.574 indexed citations breakdown →
Kong, Desheng, Keji Lai, Stefan Meister, et al.. (2010). Aharonov-Bohm interference in topological insulator nanoribbons. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2010.1 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Zhong, Xiao-Liang Qi, & Shengbai Zhang. (2010). Theory of interacting topological superfluids and superconductors. arXiv (Cornell University).
Qi, Xiao-Liang, Taylor L. Hughes, S. Raghu, & Shengbai Zhang. (2009). Time-Reversal-Invariant Topological Superconductors and Superfluids in Two and Three Dimensions. Physical Review Letters. 102(18). 187001–187001.563 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Liu, Chao‐Xing, Xiao-Liang Qi, Xi Dai, Zhong Fang, & Shoucheng Zhang. (2008). Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in HgMnTe Quantum Wells. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
Qi, Xiao-Liang, Yong-Shi Wu, & Shoucheng Zhang. (2005). Topological Quantization of the Spin Hall Effect. arXiv (Cornell University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.