Journal of Clinical Densitometry

1.8k papers and 34.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry in the last decades have received a total of 34.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.3k papers), Surgery (566 papers) and Physiology (522 papers) specifically the topics of Bone health and osteoporosis research (1.2k papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (368 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (319 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Clinical Densitometry are John T. Schousboe, William D. Leslie, Neil Binkley, John Shepherd, E. Michael Lewiecki, Didier Hans, Sanford Baim, John P. Bilezikian, Klaus Engelke and Susan B. Broy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Clinical Densitometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Clinical Densitometry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025