Sanford Baim
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 0.1%
- Bone health and osteoporosis research 27
- Bone and Joint Diseases 4
- Oncology top 5%
- Bone health and treatments 8
- Surgery top 2%
- Hip and Femur Fractures 18
- Nephrology top 5%
-
- Bone fractures and treatments 6
-
- Nutrition and Health in Aging 4
-
- Bone Metabolism and Diseases 4
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 3
- Co-authors
- John P. BilezikianDidier HansCraig B. LangmanHeidi J. KalkwarfJohn T. SchousboeMary B. LeonardNeil BinkleyJohn Shepherd
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Sanford Baim
38 papers receiving 4.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 3.0k
- Oncology 969
- Surgery 1.5k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 482
- Nephrology 185
Countries citing papers authored by Sanford Baim
This map shows the geographic impact of Sanford Baim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sanford Baim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sanford Baim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sanford Baim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sanford Baim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sanford Baim. The network helps show where Sanford Baim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sanford Baim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 91 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 6 | Executive Summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on Bone Densitometrybreakdown → | 2013 | 433 |
| 7 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 8 | Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practicebreakdown → | 2011 | 383 |
| 9 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 125 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 325 | |
| 13 | International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 Adult and Pediatric Official Positionsbreakdown → | 2008 | 441 |
| 14 | 2008 | 94 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 339 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 48 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 319 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 121 |
About Sanford Baim
Sanford Baim is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Anatomy and Surgery, having authored 39 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (27 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (18 papers), Bone health and treatments (8 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (6 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (4 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (3.0k citations), Oncology (969 citations) and Surgery (1.5k citations). Sanford Baim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include John P. Bilezikian, Didier Hans, Craig B. Langman, Heidi J. Kalkwarf, John T. Schousboe, Mary B. Leonard, Neil Binkley, John Shepherd, Bess Dawson‐Hughes and Frank Rauch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.