Nordicom review/NORDICOM review

616 papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 616 papers published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review usually cover Communication (319 papers), Sociology and Political Science (252 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (84 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (219 papers), Social Media and Politics (182 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review are Stig Hjarvard, Birgitta Höijer, Jens F. Jensen, Sigurd Allern, Helle Sjøvaag, Martin Engebretsen, Ivar John Erdal, Ari Heinonen, David Domingo and Peter Dahlgren.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review.

Countries where authors publish in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nordicom review/NORDICOM review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nordicom review/NORDICOM review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025