Case Studies on Transport Policy

1.2k papers and 11.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Case Studies on Transport Policy in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Case Studies on Transport Policy usually cover Transportation (789 papers), Automotive Engineering (321 papers) and Building and Construction (308 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Transport and Accessibility (599 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (531 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (254 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Case Studies on Transport Policy are Brian Caulfield, Craig Morton, Anthony May, David Metz, Jillian Anable, Hilde Meersman, Hironori Kato, Ransford A. Acheampong, Eduardo Medeiros and William Riggs.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Case Studies on Transport Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Case Studies on Transport Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Case Studies on Transport Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Case Studies on Transport Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Case Studies on Transport Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Case Studies on Transport Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Case Studies on Transport Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025