Psychogeriatrics

1.3k papers and 12.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Psychogeriatrics in the last decades have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychogeriatrics usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (672 papers), Physiology (231 papers) and Clinical Psychology (207 papers) specifically the topics of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (516 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (171 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychogeriatrics are Kamalesh K. Gulia, Velayudhan Mohan Kumar, Rahimah Ibrahim, Katsuya Urakami, Tengku Aizan Hamid, Haruyasu Yamaguchi, Manabu Ikeda, Gabriele Cipriani, Yadollah Abolfathi Momtaz and Heii Arai.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychogeriatrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychogeriatrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychogeriatrics.

Countries where authors publish in Psychogeriatrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychogeriatrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychogeriatrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychogeriatrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025