Electronic Markets

1.4k papers and 27.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Electronic Markets in the last decades have received a total of 27.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Electronic Markets usually cover Marketing (471 papers), Sociology and Political Science (398 papers) and Strategy and Management (372 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Platforms and Economics (289 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (260 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (238 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electronic Markets are Paul Timmers, Rainer Alt, Christian Janiesch, Kai Heinrich, Patrick Zschech, Μαριάννα Σιγάλα, Shahriar Akter, Kai Huotari, Juho Hamari and Chulmo Koo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Electronic Markets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Electronic Markets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electronic Markets.

Countries where authors publish in Electronic Markets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electronic Markets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electronic Markets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electronic Markets more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025