Chinese Medicine

1.4k papers and 30.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.4k papers published in Chinese Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 30.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (644 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (415 papers) and Pharmacology (280 papers) specifically the topics of Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (185 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (163 papers) and Ginseng Biological Effects and Applications (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Medicine are Qingwen Zhang, Ligen Lin, Wen‐Cai Ye, Alice S.T. Wong, Wen‐Wan Chao, Bi‐Fong Lin, Ikuo Nishigaki, Ramadasan Kuttan, Shilin Chen and Arthur de Sá Ferreira.

In The Last Decade

Chinese Medicine

1.2k papers receiving 29.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Chinese Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026