Clinical Autonomic Research

1.5k papers and 31.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Clinical Autonomic Research in the last decades have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Autonomic Research usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (861 papers), Surgery (578 papers) and Physiology (320 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (741 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (510 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Autonomic Research are Horacio Kaufmann, David S. Goldstein, R. Hainsworth, Phillip A. Low, Eduardo E. Benarroch, Wouter Wieling, Stephen Oppenheimer, William P. Cheshire, Roy Freeman and Stefan Braune.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Autonomic Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Autonomic Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Autonomic Research.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Autonomic Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Autonomic Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Autonomic Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Autonomic Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025