Experimental & Molecular Medicine

3.0k papers and 110.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 110.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine usually cover Molecular Biology (1.7k papers), Immunology (475 papers) and Cancer Research (445 papers) specifically the topics of RNA modifications and cancer (135 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (121 papers) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental & Molecular Medicine are Sang‐Min Jeon, Sue Goo Rhee, Dean E. Schraufnagel, Sung Ho Ryu, Chaithanya Chelakkot, Jaewang Ghim, Beom Seok Park, Jie‐Oh Lee, Young Mi Park and Duhee Bang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental & Molecular Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental & Molecular Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental & Molecular Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025