Australian Planner

1.1k papers and 7.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Australian Planner in the last decades have received a total of 7.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian Planner usually cover Urban Studies (210 papers), Sociology and Political Science (130 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (99 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Planning and Governance (131 papers), Rural development and sustainability (98 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Planner are Michael Bounds, Tan Yiğitcanlar, Stephen Hamnett, John Abbott, Ed Wensing, Peter Newman, David Pullar, Geoff McDonald, Caroline Miller and Glen Searle.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian Planner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Planner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Planner.

Countries where authors publish in Australian Planner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Planner. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Planner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Planner more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025