Brain and Behavior

4.0k papers and 50.1k indexed citations

About

The 4.0k papers published in Brain and Behavior in the last decades have received a total of 50.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain and Behavior usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k papers), Neurology (723 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (684 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (456 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (252 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (226 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain and Behavior are Olivia Remes, Carol Brayne, Louise Lafortune, Andrei V. Alexandrov, Neeta Garg, Thomas W. Smith, Mark R. Harrigan, Reza Bavarsad Shahripour, Bjørg Høie and Kari Ann Leiknes.

In The Last Decade

Brain and Behavior

3.6k papers receiving 49.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Brain and Behavior

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain and Behavior. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain and Behavior with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain and Behavior more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Brain and Behavior

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain and Behavior. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026