Bioscience Education

205 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 205 papers published in Bioscience Education in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Bioscience Education usually cover Education (117 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (27 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (26 papers) specifically the topics of Evaluation of Teaching Practices (39 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (37 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Bioscience Education are Mike Joy, Alan J. Cann, Chris Glover, Evelyn Brown, David J. Adams, R. S. Pearce, Edward J. Wood, Venetia A. Saunders, Allan Jones and Paul Orsmond.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Bioscience Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Bioscience Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Bioscience Education.

Countries where authors publish in Bioscience Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Bioscience Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Bioscience Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bioscience Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025