Environmental Forensics

About

The 929 papers published in Environmental Forensics in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Environmental Forensics usually cover Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (350 papers), Pollution (313 papers) and Environmental Engineering (176 papers) specifically the topics of Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (163 papers), Heavy metals in environment (162 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Forensics are Thomas Gauthier, Richard Doherty, Scott A. Stout, William E. Motzer, Elizabeth B. Kujawinski, Christopher M. Reddy, Amvrossios C. Bagtzoglou, John W. Farrington, Robert Morrison and Fikret Ustaoğlu.

In The Last Decade

Environmental Forensics

864 papers receiving 11.9k citations

Countries where authors publish in Environmental Forensics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Forensics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Forensics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Forensics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Environmental Forensics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Forensics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Forensics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026