Countries where authors publish in Social Identities
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Identities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Identities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Identities more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Identities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Identities.
About Social Identities
The 1.1k papers published in Social Identities in the last decades have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Identities usually cover Sociology and Political Science (687 papers), Anthropology (142 papers), Cultural Studies (109 papers), Gender Studies (117 papers) and Demography (128 papers) specifically the topics of Migration, Refugees, and Integration (134 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (87 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (71 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (64 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (59 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (59 papers), Race, History, and American Society (43 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Identities are Chong‐suk Han, John Comaroff, Michel Foucault, Henry A. Giroux, Sue Curry Jansen, Frank B. Wilderson, Zhao Tingyang, Denis‐Constant Martin, Jean Comaroff and Shaun Grech.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.