This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Artibus Asiae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Artibus Asiae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Artibus Asiae more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Artibus Asiae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Artibus Asiae.
About Artibus Asiae
The 830 papers published in Artibus Asiae in the last decades have received a total of 3.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Artibus Asiae usually cover Anthropology (221 papers), Religious studies (113 papers) and Archeology (21 papers) specifically the topics of Chinese history and philosophy (183 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (164 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (106 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (58 papers), Japanese History and Culture (47 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (46 papers), Ancient Near East History (42 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Artibus Asiae are Alexander Coburn Soper, Edith Porada, James B. Pritchard, Franz Rosenthal, R. Bayly Winder, Ibn Khaldūn, Stella Kramrisch, Arthur W. Hummel, Jessica Rawson and John Κ. Fairbank.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.