Archives and Records

269 papers and 679 indexed citations i.

About

The 269 papers published in Archives and Records in the last decades have received a total of 679 indexed citations. Papers published in Archives and Records usually cover Conservation (144 papers), Sociology and Political Science (53 papers) and Space and Planetary Science (35 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (140 papers), Archaeological Remote Sensing using Remote Sensing Techniques (35 papers) and Museums and Cultural Heritage (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives and Records are Geoffrey Yeo, Michael Jones, Ellen J. O’Flaherty, Elizabeth Shepherd, Marika Cifor, Michelle Caswell, Jennifer A. Bunn, Sarah Baker, Ria Van der Merwe and Jane Stevenson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives and Records

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives and Records. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives and Records.

Countries where authors publish in Archives and Records

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives and Records. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives and Records with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives and Records more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025