Physical Activity Review

227 papers and 770 indexed citations i.

About

The 227 papers published in Physical Activity Review in the last decades have received a total of 770 indexed citations. Papers published in Physical Activity Review usually cover Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (82 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (64 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (46 papers) specifically the topics of Sports Performance and Training (56 papers), Physical Education and Training Studies (54 papers) and Children's Physical and Motor Development (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physical Activity Review are Jacek Wąsik, Wojciech J. Cynarski, Erika Zemková, Shibili Nuhmani, John A. Johnson, Gongbing Shan, Václav Bunc, Hamid Arazi, Hélène Carbonneau and Jaromír Šimonek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physical Activity Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physical Activity Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physical Activity Review.

Countries where authors publish in Physical Activity Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physical Activity Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physical Activity Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physical Activity Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025