Asia Pacific Management Review

651 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 651 papers published in Asia Pacific Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia Pacific Management Review usually cover Strategy and Management (201 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (135 papers) and Marketing (113 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (72 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (63 papers) and Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia Pacific Management Review are Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol, Yung‐Ming Cheng, Miin-Jye Wen, Che-Hui Lien, Li‐Ching Huang, Eddy Madiono Sutanto, Heru Sulistyo, Ben‐Roy Do, Tien Wang and Ying‐Kai Liao.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asia Pacific Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia Pacific Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia Pacific Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in Asia Pacific Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia Pacific Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia Pacific Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia Pacific Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025