Anàlisi
- Communication top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Computer Networks and Communications
- History top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Fields
- Communication (268 papers)History (164 papers)Computer Networks and Communications (197 papers)
- Topics
- Media and Digital CommunicationMedia, Journalism, and Communication HistoryJournalism and Media Studies
In The Last Decade
Anàlisi
344 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Communication 894
- Sociology and Political Science 429
- Computer Networks and Communications 372
- History 193
- Gender Studies 175
Countries where authors publish in Anàlisi
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anàlisi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anàlisi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anàlisi more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Anàlisi
This network shows the impact of papers published in Anàlisi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anàlisi.
About Anàlisi
The 464 papers published in Anàlisi in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Anàlisi usually cover Communication (268 papers), History (164 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (197 papers) specifically the topics of Media and Digital Communication (197 papers), Media, Journalism, and Communication History (159 papers) and Journalism and Media Studies (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anàlisi are Daniel E. Jones, Ana Almansa Martínez, José Alberto García Avilés, Paul Ricœur, Santiago Tejedor, Milly Buonanno, Antonio Castillo Esparcia, Jesús Martín Barbero, Jordi Xifra and Maria Ranieri.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.