This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Art. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Art with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Art more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in American Art. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Art.
About American Art
The 495 papers published in American Art in the last decades have received a total of 727 indexed citations . Papers published in American Art usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (217 papers), Museology (81 papers), History (121 papers), Music (17 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 papers) specifically the topics of Art, Politics, and Modernism (101 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (95 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (89 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (80 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (31 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (24 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (20 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Art are Brian Wallis, Erika Doss, Suzi Gablik, Karal Ann Marling, Jules David Prown, Jennifer Roberts, Albert Boime, Donald B. Kuspit, Ivan Karp and Alan Wallach.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.