Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

1.7k papers and 54.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 54.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy usually cover Physiology (961 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (809 papers) and Neurology (301 papers) specifically the topics of Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (876 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (783 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (174 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy are Jeffrey L. Cummings, Henrik Zetterberg, Kate Zhong, Philip Scheltens, Marc Wortmann, Kaj Blennow, Robert Vassar, Michael T. Heneka, Oskar Hansson and Tau Ming Liew.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alzheimer s Research & Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025