The Journal of Peasant Studies

1.9k papers and 58.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in The Journal of Peasant Studies in the last decades have received a total of 58.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Peasant Studies usually cover General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (1.0k papers), Sociology and Political Science (759 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (439 papers) specifically the topics of Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (971 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (263 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (224 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Peasant Studies are Ian Scoones, Philip McMichael, Henry Bernstein, Jason W. Moore, Raj Patel, Tania Murray Li, J.D. van der Ploeg, Ben White, Saturnino M. Borras and Marc Edelman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Peasant Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Peasant Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Peasant Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Peasant Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Peasant Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Peasant Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Peasant Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025