ACS Food Science & Technology

959 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 959 papers published in ACS Food Science & Technology in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in ACS Food Science & Technology usually cover Food Science (430 papers), Plant Science (237 papers) and Nutrition and Dietetics (209 papers) specifically the topics of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (148 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (137 papers) and Food composition and properties (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACS Food Science & Technology are Jong‐Whan Rhim, Parya Ezati, Ruchir Priyadarshi, Daniel Tomé, Parya Ezati, Adil Gani, Wee Sim Choo, Daniel A. Jacobo‐Velázquez, Yau Yan Lim and Tomas Linder.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ACS Food Science & Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACS Food Science & Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACS Food Science & Technology.

Countries where authors publish in ACS Food Science & Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACS Food Science & Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACS Food Science & Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACS Food Science & Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025