Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity

379 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 379 indexed citations. Written by Christopher T. Cross and Heidi A. Schweingruber covering the research area of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Probability and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (329 citations), Statistics and Probability (266 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (130 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w88100881 →

Countries where authors are citing Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mathematics learning in early childhood : paths toward excellence and equity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w88100881.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026