The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w85013902 →Countries where authors are citing The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective
This network shows the impact of The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective.
About The Underachieving Curriculum : Assessing U.S.School Mathematics from an International Perspective
This paper, published in 1987, received 298 indexed citations . Written by F. Joe Crosswhite, Curtis C. McKnight and John A. Dossey covering the research area of Education and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (259 citations), Statistics and Probability (78 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (36 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w85013902.