Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach
Impact in
- Education 341
Classified as
- Authors
- Alison ClarkPeter Moss
- Journal
- Open Research Online (The Open University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62460092 →Countries where authors are citing Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach
This map shows the geographic impact of Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach
This network shows the impact of Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach.
About Listening To Young Children: The Mosaic Approach
This paper, published in 2001, received 509 indexed citations . Written by Alison Clark and Peter Moss covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (351 citations), Education (341 citations), Safety Research (58 citations), Clinical Psychology (51 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (34 citations). Published in Open Research Online (The Open University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62460092.