Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations
- Journal
- Academy of Management Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/259124 →Countries where authors are citing Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations
This map shows the geographic impact of Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations
This network shows the impact of Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations.
About Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations
This paper, published in 2001, received 849 indexed citations . Written by Jon L. Pierce, Tatiana Kostova and Kurt T. Dirks. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (301 citations), Sociology and Political Science (269 citations) and Marketing (203 citations). Published in Academy of Management Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/259124.