A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis
- Journal
- Administrative Science Quarterly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2390971 →Countries where authors are citing A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis
This network shows the impact of A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis.
About A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis
This paper, published in 1963, received 353 indexed citations . Written by D. S. Pugh, David J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings, Caroline Turner and Tom Lupton. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (130 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (119 citations) and Management Information Systems (78 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2390971.