Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration
- Journal
- Nature reviews. Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nrn3121 →Countries where authors are citing Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration
This map shows the geographic impact of Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration
This network shows the impact of Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration.
About Gains or losses: molecular mechanisms of TDP43-mediated neurodegeneration
This paper, published in 2011, received 515 indexed citations . Written by Edward B. Lee, Virginia M.‐Y. Lee and John Q. Trojanowski covering the research area of Neurology, Neurology and Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Neurology (384 citations), Molecular Biology (279 citations) and Genetics (202 citations). Published in Nature reviews. Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nrn3121.