Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jf011097r →Countries where authors are citing Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries
This map shows the geographic impact of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries
This network shows the impact of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries.
About Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity of Georgia-Grown Blueberries and Blackberries
This paper, published in 2002, received 557 indexed citations . Written by Subramani Sellappan, Casimir C. Akoh and Gerard Krewer covering the research area of Biochemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Food Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biochemistry (402 citations), Plant Science (225 citations) and Food Science (187 citations). Published in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jf011097r.