Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity
- Authors
- Gow‐Chin YenHui-Yin Chen
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/jf00049a007 →Countries where authors are citing Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity
This map shows the geographic impact of Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity
This network shows the impact of Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity.
About Antioxidant Activity of Various Tea Extracts in Relation to Their Antimutagenicity
This paper, published in 1995, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by Gow‐Chin Yen and Hui-Yin Chen covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Biochemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biochemistry (1.2k citations), Plant Science (842 citations) and Food Science (784 citations). Published in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/jf00049a007.