National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning

2.3k indexed citations
published 1992

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w66446864 →

Countries where authors are citing National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning.

About National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning

This paper, published in 1992, received 2.3k indexed citations . Written by Björn Johnson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (1.1k citations), Strategy and Management (1.0k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (699 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w66446864.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026