Zsófia Benedek

27 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Zsófia Benedek
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Business and International Management 41
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77
  • Food Science 139
  • Plant Science 174
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 7
Replace José Luis Vivero Pol with:
José Luis Vivero Pol Belgium
Lee Ann Jackson Switzerland
Adele Coppola Italy
Miķelis Grīviņš United Kingdom
Jacqui Dibden Australia
Steven R. McGreevy Japan
Isaac Ankamah‐Yeboah Denmark
Zhenzhong Si Canada
Benjamin E. Graeub Italy
Pierre Gasselin France
Zsófia Benedek relative to José Luis Vivero Pol Belgium José Luis Vivero Pol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
José Luis Vivero Pol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Zsófia Benedek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Zsófia Benedek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Zsófia Benedek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Zsófia Benedek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Zsófia Benedek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Zsófia Benedek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Zsófia Benedek. The network helps show where Zsófia Benedek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Zsófia Benedek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Zsófia Benedek Line = papers co-authored together Zsófia Benedek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202192
2 200775
3 201748
4 202135
5 200726
6 202023
7 202123
8 202322
9 201520
10 202018
11 201816
12 201116
13 202012
14 201911
15
Success or Waste of Taxpayer Money? Impact Assessment of Rural Development Programs in Hungary
20199
16 20179
17 20237
18 20146
19 20255
20 20195

About Zsófia Benedek

Zsófia Benedek is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science, Ecology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 33 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Food and Agriculture (13 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (10 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (6 papers), Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (6 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (4 papers), Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (4 papers), Rural development and sustainability (3 papers) and Global trade and economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (41 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (77 citations), Food Science (139 citations), Plant Science (174 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (7 citations). Zsófia Benedek has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Czechia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Imre Fertő, Ferenc Jordán, János Podani, Adrienn Molnár, Zoltán Bakucs, Bálint Balázs, Gusztáv Nemes, Andràs Báldí, Lajos Baráth and Tae‐Yeon Kim. Their work appears in journals such as EuroChoices, European Planning Studies, Ecological Indicators, Sustainability and The Science of The Total Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact