Z. A. Pełczyński
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- History top 10%
- Topics
- Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers)Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPoland
In The Last Decade
Z. A. Pełczyński
11 papers receiving 131 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- Political Science and International Relations 100
- Philosophy 42
- Economics and Econometrics 17
- History 12
Countries citing papers authored by Z. A. Pełczyński
This map shows the geographic impact of Z. A. Pełczyński's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Z. A. Pełczyński with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Z. A. Pełczyński more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Z. A. Pełczyński
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Z. A. Pełczyński. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Z. A. Pełczyński. The network helps show where Z. A. Pełczyński may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Z. A. Pełczyński
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Z. A. Pełczyński. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Z. A. Pełczyński based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Z. A. Pełczyński. Z. A. Pełczyński is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Conceptions of Liberty in Political Philosophy | 38 |
| 4 | The State and Civil Society:Studies in Hegel's Political Philosophy | 62 |
| 5 | Najnowsze dzieje Polski z perspektywy Cambridge : (w związku z książką Robert F. Leslie, Antony Polonsky, Jan M. Ciechanowski, Z. A. Pełczyński, The History of Poland since 1863, ed. by R. F. Leslie, Cambridge 1980) / Marian M. Drozdowski, Andrzej Garlicki, Stefan Kieniewicz. | 3 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | Hegel's political philosophy, problems and perspectives : a collection of new essays | 2 |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Z. A. Pełczyński
Z. A. Pełczyński is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Linguistics and Language and Cultural Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (100 citations), Philosophy (42 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (116 citations). Z. A. Pełczyński has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include John Gray, George Armstrong Kelly, John Plamenatz, T. M. Knox and Antony Polonsky. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, The Philosophical Quarterly and Electoral Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.