John Gray
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Keng‐Hock PweeZ. A. PełczyńskiJohn E. WalkerAlison K. HuttlyAndrew L. PhillipsAlison CozensCarl I. WebsterBarbara Newman
- Topics
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers)Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of SciencePolitical Science and International RelationsPlant Science
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
John Gray
14 papers receiving 458 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Molecular Biology 229
- Plant Science 146
- Sociology and Political Science 111
- Political Science and International Relations 103
- Economics and Econometrics 95
Countries citing papers authored by John Gray
This map shows the geographic impact of John Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Gray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Gray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Gray. The network helps show where John Gray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Gray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Gray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Gray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Gray. John Gray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | Kazakhstan: A Review of Farm Restructuring | 15 |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 129 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | Conceptions of Liberty in Political Philosophy | 38 |
| 14 | Hayek on liberty | 118 |
| 15 | 3 |
About John Gray
John Gray is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (23 citations), Political Science and International Relations (103 citations) and Plant Science (146 citations). John Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Keng‐Hock Pwee, Z. A. Pełczyński, John E. Walker, Alison K. Huttly, Andrew L. Phillips, Alison Cozens, Carl I. Webster, Barbara Newman, Johnathan A. Napier and Paul Hakendorf. Their work appears in journals such as The EMBO Journal, Diabetes and The Plant Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.