Yama Issa
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Harry van Goor (9 shared papers)Richard Peter ten Broek (4 shared papers)Marja A. Boermeester (20 shared papers)Hjalmar C. van Santvoort (18 shared papers)Roy F.P.M. Kruitwagen (1 shared paper)Evert J. P. van Santbrink (1 shared paper)Nicole D. Bouvy (1 shared paper)Erica A. Bakkum (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Surgery (6 papers)Pancreatology (4 papers)British journal of surgery (3 papers)Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2 papers)Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Yama Issa
38 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Yama Issa's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Surgery 1.5k
- Oncology 413
- Gastroenterology 41
- Emergency Medicine 35
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 27
Countries citing papers authored by Yama Issa
This map shows the geographic impact of Yama Issa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Yama Issa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Yama Issa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Yama Issa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Yama Issa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Yama Issa. The network helps show where Yama Issa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Yama Issa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 490 |
| 2 | 2016 | 233 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 191 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 158 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 92 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 67 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 56 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 19 |
About Yama Issa
Yama Issa is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Gastroenterology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (30 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (4 papers), Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (2 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (1 paper), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.5k citations), Oncology (413 citations), Gastroenterology (41 citations), Emergency Medicine (35 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (27 citations). Yama Issa has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Harry van Goor, Richard Peter ten Broek, Marja A. Boermeester, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Roy F.P.M. Kruitwagen, Evert J. P. van Santbrink, Nicole D. Bouvy, Erica A. Bakkum, Johannes J. Jeekel and Maroeska Mariet Rovers. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, Pancreatology, British journal of surgery, Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.