Ya-Ching Lee

582 citations
22 papers · 447 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ya-Ching Lee

22 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Ya-Ching Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Information Systems and Management 196
  • Communication 54
  • Marketing 64
  • Management Information Systems 42
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 48
Replace Rebecca Grant with:
Rebecca Grant United States
Manimekalai Jambulingam Malaysia
Brandis Phillips United States
Paul Mercieca Australia
Chan Hsiao Taiwan
Md Ashaduzzaman Australia
Fei L. Weisstein United States
Himanshu Seth India
David Nickell United States
Angelina I. T. Kiser United States
Ya-Ching Lee relative to Rebecca Grant United States Rebecca Grant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Rebecca Grant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ya-Ching Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ya-Ching Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ya-Ching Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ya-Ching Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ya-Ching Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ya-Ching Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ya-Ching Lee. The network helps show where Ya-Ching Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Ya-Ching Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ya-Ching Lee Line = papers co-authored together Ya-Ching Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007119
2 201063
3 201140
4 201738
5 201433
6 201631
7 200920
8 200717
9 201513
10 201012
11 201610
12 201110
13 20099
14 20178
15 20156
16 20125
17
The Role of Perceived Resources in E-Learning Adoption
20063
18 20203
19 20103
20 20112

About Ya-Ching Lee

Ya-Ching Lee is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems, Marketing and Strategy and Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (10 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (5 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (4 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers) and Collaboration in agile enterprises (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (196 citations), Communication (54 citations), Marketing (64 citations), Management Information Systems (42 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (48 citations). Ya-Ching Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Hsing‐Lung Lien, Pin‐Yu Chu, Hai‐Hsuan Cheng and Liang‐Ming Whang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Management & Organization, Chemosphere, Computers in Human Behavior, Telecommunications Policy and Journal of Computer Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact