Wouter T. Gude

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 664 citations indexed

About

Wouter T. Gude is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Wouter T. Gude has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 664 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Health Information Management and 6 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Wouter T. Gude's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers). Wouter T. Gude is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (11 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers). Wouter T. Gude collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Canada. Wouter T. Gude's co-authors include Niels Peek, Sabine N van der Veer, Nicolette F. de Keizer, Noah Ivers, Jill Francis, Benjamin Brown, Gavin Daker‐White, Fabiana Lorencatto, Thomas Blakeman and Justin Presseau and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, PLoS Medicine and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

Wouter T. Gude

25 papers receiving 656 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

2019 195 citations Benjamin Brown, Wouter T. Gude et al. Implementation Science profile →

Peers

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter T. Gude

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter T. Gude's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter T. Gude with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter T. Gude more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter T. Gude

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter T. Gude. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter T. Gude. The network helps show where Wouter T. Gude may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wouter T. Gude

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wouter T. Gude. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wouter T. Gude based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wouter T. Gude. Wouter T. Gude is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

#	Work	Indexed citations
1	Evaluation of a pharmacist-led actionable audit and feedback intervention for improving medication safety in UK primary care: An interrupted time series analysis 2020 ·PLoS Medicine ·Niels Peek, Wouter T. Gude, Richard N. Keers, Richard Williams, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Mark Jeffries, Denham L. Phipps, Benjamin Brown, Anthony Avery, Darren M. Ashcroft	20
2	Understanding the utilisation of a novel interactive electronic medication safety dashboard in general practice: a mixed methods study 2020 ·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making ·Mark Jeffries, Wouter T. Gude, Richard N. Keers, Denham L. Phipps, Richard Williams, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Benjamin Brown, Anthony Avery, Niels Peek, Darren M. Ashcroft	19
3	Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial 2019 ·BMJ Quality & Safety ·Marie-José Roos-Blom, Wouter T. Gude, Evert de Jonge, Jan Jaap Spijkstra, Sabine N van der Veer, Niels Peek, Dave A. Dongelmans, Nicolette F. de Keizer	25
4	Understanding and optimising electronic audit and feedback to improve quality of care 2019 ·UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) ·Wouter T. Gude	1
5	Control Theory to Design and Evaluate Audit and Feedback Interventions 2019 ·Studies in health technology and informatics ·Wouter T. Gude, Niels Peek	3
6	Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence 2019 ·Implementation Science ·Wouter T. Gude, Benjamin Brown, Sabine N van der Veer, Heather Colquhoun, Noah Ivers, Jamie Brehaut, Zach Landis‐Lewis, Christopher J. Armitage, Nicolette F. de Keizer, Niels Peek	65
7	Facilitating action planning within audit and feedback interventions: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an action implementation toolbox in intensive care 2019 ·Implementation Science ·Wouter T. Gude, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Sabine N van der Veer, Dave A. Dongelmans, Evert de Jonge, Niels Peek, Nicolette F. de Keizer	14
8	Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research breakdown → 2019 ·Implementation Science ·Benjamin Brown, Wouter T. Gude, Thomas Blakeman, Sabine N van der Veer, Noah Ivers, Jill Francis, Fabiana Lorencatto, Justin Presseau, Niels Peek, Gavin Daker‐White	195
9	Measuring quality indicators to improve pain management in critically ill patients 2018 ·Journal of Critical Care ·Marie-José Roos-Blom, Wouter T. Gude, Jan Jaap Spijkstra, Evert de Jonge, Dave A. Dongelmans, Nicolette F. de Keizer	7
10	Development of actionable quality indicators and an action implementation toolbox for appropriate antibiotic use at intensive care units: A modified-RAND Delphi study 2018 ·PLoS ONE ·(unknown), Marie-José Roos-Blom, Dave A. Dongelmans, Jeroen Schouten, Wouter T. Gude, Evert de Jonge, Jan M. Prins, Nicolette F. de Keizer	22
11	Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units 2018 ·Implementation Science ·Wouter T. Gude, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Sabine N van der Veer, Dave A. Dongelmans, Evert de Jonge, Jill Francis, Niels Peek, Nicolette F. de Keizer	32
12	Development of a Web-Based Quality Dashboard Including a Toolbox to Improve Pain Management in Dutch Intensive Care. 2017 ·PubMed ·Marie-José Roos-Blom, Wouter T. Gude, Evert de Jonge, Jan Jaap Spijkstra, Sabine N van der Veer, Dave A. Dongelmans, Nicolette F. de Keizer	3
13	Informatics for Health 2017: Advancing both science and practice 2017 ·Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics ·Philip Scott, Ronald Cornet, Colin McCowan, Niels Peek, Paolo Fraccaro, Nophar Geifman, Wouter T. Gude, William Hulme, Glen P. Martin, Richard Williams	7
14	Evaluation Considerations for Secondary Uses of Clinical Data: Principles for an Evidence-based Approach to Policy and Implementation of Secondary Analysis 2017 ·Yearbook of Medical Informatics ·Philip Scott, Michael Rigby, Elske Ammenwerth, (unknown), Andrew Georgiou, Hannele Hyppönen, Nicolette F. de Keizer, Farah Magrabi, Päivi Nykänen, Wouter T. Gude, Werner O. Hackl	14
15	Electronic audit and feedback intervention with action implementation toolbox to improve pain management in intensive care: protocol for a laboratory experiment and cluster randomised trial 2017 ·Implementation Science ·Wouter T. Gude, Marie-José Roos-Blom, Sabine N van der Veer, Evert de Jonge, Niels Peek, Dave A. Dongelmans, Nicolette F. de Keizer	22
16	Effect of a web-based audit and feedback intervention with outreach visits on the clinical performance of multidisciplinary teams: a cluster-randomized trial in cardiac rehabilitation 2016 ·Implementation Science ·Wouter T. Gude, Mariëtte M van Engen-Verheul, Sabine N van der Veer, Hareld Kemps, Monique Jaspers, Nicolette F. de Keizer, Niels Peek	19
17	Inside the Black Box of Audit and Feedback: a Laboratory Study to Explore Determinants of Improvement Target Selection by Healthcare Professionals in Cardiac Rehabilitation. 2015 ·PubMed ·Wouter T. Gude, Sabine N van der Veer, Mariëtte M van Engen-Verheul, Nicolette F. de Keizer, Niels Peek	7
18	Diabetes Patients' Experiences With the Implementation of Insulin Therapy and Their Perceptions of Computer-Assisted Self-Management Systems for Insulin Therapy 2014 ·Journal of Medical Internet Research ·(unknown), Wouter T. Gude, F. Holleman, J. B. L. Hoekstra, Niels Peek	14
19	Safety and usability evaluation of a web-based insulin self-titration system for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2013 ·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine ·(unknown), F. Holleman, Wouter T. Gude, J. B. L. Hoekstra, Linda Peute, Monique Jaspers, Niels Peek	17
20	Safety of a web-based insulin titration system for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - pilot study. 2012 ·PubMed ·(unknown), F. Holleman, Wouter T. Gude, (unknown), Niels Peek	3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact