Michael Philipp

1.9k total citations
24 papers, 228 citations indexed

About

Michael Philipp is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Philipp has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 228 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Michael Philipp's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Michael Philipp is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). Michael Philipp collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Michael Philipp's co-authors include Katherine R. Storrs, Andy Towers, Laura Lombardo, Stephen Hill, Peter Robert Cannon, Kathleen D. Vohs, Matthew J. Hornsey, Matt N Williams, Toby Mündel and Katharine H. Greenaway and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Applied Physiology and Food Research International.

In The Last Decade

Michael Philipp

20 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael Philipp New Zealand 10 52 43 33 32 29 24 228
Lence Miloseva North Macedonia 8 46 0.9× 17 0.4× 30 0.9× 41 1.3× 67 2.3× 22 348
Zhuang Liu China 7 38 0.7× 39 0.9× 19 0.6× 36 1.1× 34 1.2× 16 282
Н. Н. Петрова Russia 8 40 0.8× 17 0.4× 16 0.5× 24 0.8× 26 0.9× 102 283
Niels Egelund Denmark 10 57 1.1× 58 1.3× 35 1.1× 80 2.5× 56 1.9× 29 506
Sung‐Ha Lee South Korea 10 38 0.7× 20 0.5× 67 2.0× 63 2.0× 46 1.6× 25 346
Vesta Steiblienė Lithuania 11 24 0.5× 27 0.6× 17 0.5× 24 0.8× 10 0.3× 33 278
Natasha Clarke United Kingdom 14 33 0.6× 30 0.7× 60 1.8× 31 1.0× 88 3.0× 30 511
Janet Veldstra Netherlands 9 58 1.1× 36 0.8× 27 0.8× 77 2.4× 17 0.6× 15 358
Virginija Adomaitienė Lithuania 9 25 0.5× 24 0.6× 42 1.3× 121 3.8× 10 0.3× 32 327
Anita Feher Canada 5 80 1.5× 34 0.8× 11 0.3× 64 2.0× 19 0.7× 9 307

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Philipp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Philipp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Philipp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Philipp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Philipp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Philipp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Philipp. The network helps show where Michael Philipp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Philipp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Philipp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Philipp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Philipp. Michael Philipp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (2025). Political Polarization and Wellbeing: Investigating Potential Intrapersonal Harm From Affective Polarization. International Review of Social Psychology. 38(1). 15–15.
2.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (2024). Development and Validation of the Affective Polarization Scale. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 37(1). 11–11. 2 indexed citations
3.
Beaudry, Jennifer L, Matt N Williams, Michael Philipp, & Emily Kothe. (2022). What do Incoming University Students Believe About Open Science Practices in Psychology?. Teaching of Psychology. 51(3). 269–276. 1 indexed citations
4.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (2022). Hypohydration but not menstrual phase influences pain perception in healthy women. Journal of Applied Physiology. 132(3). 611–621. 7 indexed citations
5.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (2021). Misinformation effects in an online sample: results of an experimental study with a five day retention interval. PeerJ. 9. e12299–e12299. 1 indexed citations
6.
Grimshaw, Gina M. & Michael Philipp. (2020). Bodies in mind: using peripheral psychophysiology to probe emotional and social processes. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 51(1). 171–185. 4 indexed citations
7.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (2020). Pain Across the Menstrual Cycle: Considerations of Hydration. Frontiers in Physiology. 11. 585667–585667. 7 indexed citations
8.
Cannon, Peter Robert, et al.. (2020). Facial electromyography and subjective liking data from 70 New Zealand participants in response to food images and chocolate samples. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 29. 105124–105124. 2 indexed citations
9.
Philipp, Michael, Michael J. Bernstein, Eric J. Vanman, & Lucy Johnston. (2020). Social exclusion enhances affiliative signaling. The Journal of Social Psychology. 161(4). 508–518. 2 indexed citations
10.
Cannon, Peter Robert, et al.. (2020). The influence of timing, location and social setting on hedonic and emotional evaluations of past eating experiences. British Food Journal. 122(7). 2203–2217. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cannon, Peter Robert, et al.. (2019). An unfamiliar social presence reduces facial disgust responses to food stimuli. Food Research International. 126. 108662–108662. 12 indexed citations
12.
Cannon, Peter Robert, et al.. (2019). Co-acting strangers but not friends influence subjective liking and facial affective responses to food stimuli. Food Quality and Preference. 82. 103865–103865. 11 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Matt N, Rasmus Bååth, & Michael Philipp. (2017). Using Bayes Factors to Test Hypotheses in Developmental Research. Research in Human Development. 14(4). 321–337. 12 indexed citations
14.
Philipp, Michael & Laura Lombardo. (2017). Hurt feelings and four letter words: Swearing alleviates the pain of social distress. European Journal of Social Psychology. 47(4). 517–523. 19 indexed citations
15.
Towers, Andy, Matt N Williams, Stephen Hill, Michael Philipp, & Ross Flett. (2016). What Makes for the Most Intense Regrets? Comparing the Effects of Several Theoretical Predictors of Regret Intensity. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1941–1941. 18 indexed citations
16.
Towers, Andy, Michael Philipp, Patrick Dulin, & Joanne Allen. (2016). The “Health Benefits” of Moderate Drinking in Older Adults may be Better Explained by Socioeconomic Status. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 73(4). gbw152–gbw152. 27 indexed citations
18.
Philipp, Michael, Katherine R. Storrs, & Eric J. Vanman. (2012). Sociality of facial expressions in immersive virtual environments: A facial EMG study. Biological Psychology. 91(1). 17–21. 15 indexed citations
19.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (1988). Preference of respiratory phases to perform reaction time tasks.. PubMed. 30(2). 153–5. 1 indexed citations
20.
Philipp, Michael, et al.. (1988). Breathing phases, slow cortical potentials (CNV) and the EEG frequency spectrum.. PubMed. 30(2). 151–151.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026