Wolfgang Bokelmann

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
88 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Wolfgang Bokelmann is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science and Business and International Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolfgang Bokelmann has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 21 papers in Plant Science and 13 papers in Business and International Management. Recurrent topics in Wolfgang Bokelmann's work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (19 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (16 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (13 papers). Wolfgang Bokelmann is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Innovations and Practices (19 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (16 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (13 papers). Wolfgang Bokelmann collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Kenya and Colombia. Wolfgang Bokelmann's co-authors include Mohammed Nasir Uddin, Ravi Nandi, Hillary K. Bett, K.J. Peters, Oscar Ingasia Ayuya, George Owuor, Eric Obedy Gido, Maria Busse, Bettina König and Rosemarie Siebert and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Waste Management and Resources Conservation and Recycling.

In The Last Decade

Wolfgang Bokelmann

84 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Factors Affecting Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies to Envir... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 50 100 150 200

Peers

Wolfgang Bokelmann
Luiza Toma United Kingdom
Wolfgang Bokelmann
Citations per year, relative to Wolfgang Bokelmann Wolfgang Bokelmann (= 1×) peers Luiza Toma

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Bokelmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Bokelmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Bokelmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Bokelmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Bokelmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Bokelmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Bokelmann. The network helps show where Wolfgang Bokelmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Bokelmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Bokelmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Bokelmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Bokelmann. Wolfgang Bokelmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
König, Barbara, et al.. (2021). Plant protection in private gardens in Germany: between growing environmental awareness, knowledge and actual behaviour. European Journal of Horticultural Science. 86(1). 59–68. 2 indexed citations
2.
Spiller, Achim, Britta Renner, Lieske Voget-Kleschin, et al.. (2020). Politik für eine nachhaltigere Ernährung : Eine integrierte Ernährungspolitik entwickeln und faire Ernährungsumgebungen gestalten ; Gutachten des Wissenschaftlichen Beirats für Agrarpolitik, Ernährung und gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz beim Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft ; Juni 2020. OpenAgrar. 5 indexed citations
3.
Turoop, Losenge, et al.. (2020). Demystifying the Contribution of African Indigenous Vegetables to Nutrition-Sensitive Value Chains in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Science. 12(8). 82–82. 1 indexed citations
4.
Nandi, Ravi, et al.. (2019). Determinants of social capital formation among organic and conventional smallholder producers in Karnataka, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 32(1). 81–89. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, et al.. (2019). Toward Sustainability or Efficiency: The Case of Smallholder Coffee Farmers in Vietnam. Economies. 7(3). 66–66. 25 indexed citations
6.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, et al.. (2018). The significance of avoiding household food waste – A means-end-chain approach. Waste Management. 74. 34–42. 39 indexed citations
7.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, et al.. (2017). Assessing Rural Development:Indicators Based on Heritages of the Peasantry Analytical Framework. 36(4). 455–455. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, et al.. (2016). Contributing to a better understanding of the value chain framework in developing countries. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1 indexed citations
9.
Gido, Eric Obedy, Oscar Ingasia Ayuya, George Owuor, & Wolfgang Bokelmann. (2016). Consumer���s choice of retail outlets for African indigenous vegetables: Empirical evidence among rural and urban households in Kenya. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2(1). 19 indexed citations
10.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, et al.. (2015). Approaches of the German food industry for addressing the issue of food losses. Waste Management. 48. 423–429. 69 indexed citations
11.
Nandi, Ravi, et al.. (2014). Consumer Preferences and Influencing Factors for Purchase Places of Organic Food Products: Empirical Evidence from South India. Indian Journal of Marketing. 44(5). 5–5. 2 indexed citations
12.
Uddin, Mohammed Nasir, et al.. (2014). Factors Affecting Farmers’ Adaptation Strategies to Environmental Degradation and Climate Change Effects: A Farm Level Study in Bangladesh. Climate. 2(4). 223–241. 249 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Bett, Hillary K., et al.. (2012). Linking Utilisation and Conservation of Indigenous Chicken Genetic Resources to Value Chains. 2(1). 33–51. 15 indexed citations
14.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, Alexandra Doernberg, Maria Busse, et al.. (2012). Nachhaltige Innovationen in der Landwirtschaft: Komplexe Herausforderungen im Innovationssystem. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung. 81(4). 71–91. 6 indexed citations
15.
Bett, Hillary K., KJ Peters, & Wolfgang Bokelmann. (2011). Hedonic price analysis to guide in breeding and production of Indigenous chicken in Kenya.. Livestock research for rural development. 23(6). 20 indexed citations
16.
Bokelmann, Wolfgang, et al.. (2010). The Need for Information Sharing Among Stakeholders: Lesson for Sustainable Biotechnology Adoption. AMERICAN-EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE. 4(3). 374–385. 1 indexed citations
17.
Gruda, Nazim S., et al.. (2009). The effect of price increases of heating oil on horticultural companies in Saxony. Part II: Measures for saving energy costs in glasshouse companies.. 87(2). 246–265. 4 indexed citations
18.
Gruda, Nazim S., et al.. (2009). The effect of price increases of heating oil on horticultural companies in Saxony. Part I: initial energy situation of glasshouse companies.. 87(1). 87–105. 4 indexed citations
19.
Peters, K.J., et al.. (2009). Information access and relevance affects adoption decision: rethinking adopter categorization.. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 5(4). 411–422. 3 indexed citations
20.
Peters, K.J., et al.. (2009). Can Cooperative Membership and Participation Affect Adoption Decisions? Issues for Sustainable Biotechnology Dissemination. MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri). 12. 437–451. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026