Julia Schmid
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 19
- Co-authors
- Sigrid Elsenbruch (9 shared papers)Sylvia Kirchengast (3 shared papers)Sven Benson (5 shared papers)Michael Forsting (5 shared papers)Johannes C. Huber (2 shared papers)Elisabeth Vytiska‐Binstorfer (2 shared papers)Nina Theysohn (4 shared papers)Achim Conzelmann (19 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cryogenics (3 papers)Pain (2 papers)Animal Welfare (2 papers)Neurogastroenterology & Motility (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Julia Schmid
69 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Reproductive Medicine 164
- Applied Psychology 87
- Cognitive Neuroscience 249
- Gastroenterology 68
- Complementary and alternative medicine 89
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schmid
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schmid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schmid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schmid. The network helps show where Julia Schmid may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Schmid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 122 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 58 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 48 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 16 | 1970 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 16 |
About Julia Schmid
Julia Schmid is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Social Psychology and Physiology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (16 papers), Physical Activity and Health (16 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (164 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (249 citations), Gastroenterology (68 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (89 citations). Julia Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Sigrid Elsenbruch, Sylvia Kirchengast, Sven Benson, Michael Forsting, Johannes C. Huber, Elisabeth Vytiska‐Binstorfer, Nina Theysohn, Achim Conzelmann, Dorothea Kübler and Elke R. Gizewski. Their work appears in journals such as Cryogenics, Pain, Animal Welfare, Neurogastroenterology & Motility and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.