Wolf Barth
- Geometry and Topology top 0.05%
- Mathematical Physics top 0.5%
- Applied Mathematics top 1%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Co-authors
- A. Van de VenChris PetersKlaus HulekMichaël OtteThomas BauerA. SartiEberhard OeljeklausPeter Knabner
- Topics
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (15 papers)Advanced Algebra and Geometry (8 papers)Mathematics and Applications (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Wolf Barth
30 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Geometry and Topology 2.4k
- Mathematical Physics 1.2k
- Applied Mathematics 586
- Algebra and Number Theory 424
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 322
Countries citing papers authored by Wolf Barth
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf Barth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf Barth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf Barth. The network helps show where Wolf Barth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolf Barth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolf Barth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolf Barth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolf Barth. Wolf Barth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Compact Complex Surfacesbreakdown → | 509 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Poncelet theorems | 21 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | Elliptic fibres on Enriques surfaces | 0 |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 117 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | Lokale Cohomologie bei isolierten singularitäten analytischer mengen | 3 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Verallgemeinerung des bertinischen Theorems in abelschen Mannigfaltigkeiten | 3 |
| 20 | 10 |
About Wolf Barth
Wolf Barth is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Geometry and Topology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (15 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (8 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (2.4k citations), Mathematical Physics (1.2k citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (424 citations). Wolf Barth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. Van de Ven, Chris Peters, Klaus Hulek, Michaël Otte, Thomas Bauer, A. Sarti, Eberhard Oeljeklaus, Peter Knabner and Herbert Lange. Their work appears in journals such as Inventiones mathematicae, American Journal of Mathematics and Mathematische Annalen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.